One framework from input to decision.
Each screen follows the same logic: establish the transaction case, test the proposed structure, identify the breakpoints, and conclude with the recommendation the buyer needs to make.
Input
CIM, financials, model, lender terms, purchase price, assumptionsSubmitted materials frame the starting transaction case.
Why it matters: the analysis stays anchored to the buyer’s materials and stated assumptions.
Analysis
EBITDA, leverage, DSCR, interest coverage, IRR, MOIC, downside casesThe deal is tested as a capital structure, not just as an attractive company.
Why it matters: the screen shows whether the proposed structure can absorb stress before deeper diligence begins.
Breakpoints
Conditions that would change the recommendationCorebeam identifies the one or two changes that could move the outcome.
Why it matters: buyers can see whether the deal can be fixed through valuation, leverage, terms, or assumptions.
Decision
Advance, Review Further, or Do Not AdvanceThe verdict is tied to the primary driver, key metrics, red flags, and next step.
Why it matters: the output gives a clear preliminary path instead of another open-ended model review.
Each screen ends with one of three preliminary outcomes.
The recommendation is tied to the submitted materials, return profile, debt service capacity, downside protection, and red flags.
Possible preliminary outcomesAdvanceReview FurtherDo Not Advance